Reply By: ModeratemanPosted: Thursday, October 27, 2005well hitler was not all bad donna, well maybe mostly bad, ok down right evil, not totally evil just some, well mostly. Elie....you've got to make up your mind.....of course he was...annilihating so many people and if he had lived today......I won't even go there!

"If" that evil bugger lived today....As crippled as I am I would be looking for some way to put a round in his head from about 1200 yards out! I could "still" do the shot. But I seriously doubt that I'd get away afterwards.

If" that evil bugger lived today....As crippled as I am I would be looking for some way to put a round in his head from about 1200 yards out! I could "still" do the shot. But I seriously doubt that I'd get away afterwards.

drmiler...you made me laugh! And then we would hire you the best lawyer ever!

If" that evil bugger lived today....As crippled as I am I would be looking for some way to put a round in his head from about 1200 yards out! I could "still" do the shot. But I seriously doubt that I'd get away afterwards. drmiler...you made me laugh! And then we would hire you the best lawyer ever!

Glad to be of service. I wasn't to awful worried about a court of law as much as I was about physically getting away from the scene with my life.

Glad to be of service. I wasn't to awful worried about a court of law as much as I was about physically getting away from the scene with my life.

You did it again...I'm laughing my head off with the visual...even though in that circumstance running for your life would not be funny!

You did it again...I'm laughing my head off with the visual...even though in that circumstance running for your life would not be funny!

Just remember Blutto in Animal house and his getting away from the Sorority House.  That would be DRMiler.

Uh, I think it was the right-wing flag-freaks who were abusing the Hitler analogy: "Saddam is another Hitler.....[etc.]".

It was only when the comparisons between Bush and Hitler were getting too close to home that Parker decided that such references were going out of style.

I think they're all terrorists: Bush, Hitler, Saddam. But Saddam didn't have WMDs, he was in a box, and he could have been kept contained without the terrible costs of Bush's invasion and elective war.

Comparing Saddam to Hitler is apt. Comparing Bush or Blair or Pope Benedict XVI is not.

And I want to point to my dictionary again; but won't.

Who was comparing the Pope to Hitler? That is beyond ignorance and hatred. Comparing a politician to Hitler is one thing (and in Bush's case really silly), but the Pope???

I think they're all terrorists: Bush, Hitler, Saddam. But Saddam didn't have WMDs, he was in a box, and he could have been kept contained without the terrible costs of Bush's invasion and elective war.

Learn the words. "Terrorist" doesn't mean what you think it means.

At one point Hitler didn't have WMDs, was in a box, and could have been kept contained without the terrible costs of the Anglo-American invasion and elective war.

Unfortunately France refused to enforce the sanctions at the time and did nothing when Hitler remilitarized the Rhineland.

The problem with moustache dictators is not that it is expensive to remove them when they are under control. The problem is the price when trying to get them after control is lost.

At least the world reacted when Saddam took Kuwait. The Czechs were not so lucky.

I don't get the left's love for dictatorships.

When people compare Stalin and Hitler and the Chinese leadership, though, Hitler always seems more evil to them.

Stalin and Mao had better publicists.