Life as I Know It; Family; Lifestyle; and Healthy Living!
headed for disaster?
Published on September 14, 2006 By foreverserenity In TV Shows
I've been hearing the buzz about the next installment of Survivor and it's rather heated, already. The producers have decided that they will have four ethnic groups of all Blacks, all Whites, all Asians and all Hispanics/Latinos. The contestants didn't know this was how it was going down this time around until the night before actual filming.

I can't imagine anyone getting that far and wanting to walk away just because the producers decided to pit them against each other in this manner. I'm sure all of them will stay, and so far it seems they have.

I've heard that there have been a lot of protesting by people far and wide, (read overseas) about them doing this. We all know the producers are doing this basically for ratings. Who won't watch it? I doubt that many won't. Due to the novelty of it, and perhaps to see some people fail, many will.

Another group who is also cheering this on are the Arian groups around the world. Yea, watch the others fall at their feet. I can see the salivas dripping!LOL! Aw people....

It's actually on right now, I am curious to see the outcome of this first episode and perhaps I'll stay around to see the end of the entire series. I don't know. Honestly, I have lost interest in the show since the first couple of seasons. It's like they just keep doing the same things over again, nothing interesting in seeing people connive, and lie and cut throat each other.

I know I'm probably in the minority who don't watch it much anymore. It's still interesting to some so that's what has kept it on. However the ratings have dropped a lot in recent years, and hence this debacle of the new shows.

According to Jeff Probst (hope I spell his name right) he wants to see the end of racism as is and this show will get people together somehow. Uh uh...and maybe you should have made the show more diverse from day one? Maybe your audience would have been a good representation of what the world looks like? Maybe people are just plain bored by Survivor, they've moved on and now he wants to get his foothold on the diversity market. The possibilites are endless.

Maybe I'm just being too cynical. I'm not really, just tired of people doing stupid things and trying to justify it with good intentions. Why should this be such a hot cake of contention now? Why should this be the way it is at this point in 2006? I guess it just shows how fragile our world still is. And that makes it sad to think about.

Comments
on Sep 14, 2006
They're pitting different races against each other in hopes of ending racism?...Hmm, someone please explain that to me...I seem to have trouble grasping that one.

~Zoo
on Sep 14, 2006
Hmm, someone please explain that to me...I seem to have trouble grasping that one.


Jeff Probst tried on a TV interview I watched but failed miserably. He should just admit it's for ratings! I guess we'll see how it pans out, if we stay tune.
on Sep 15, 2006

failed miserably. He should just admit it's for ratings!

Yep!  But actually, that makes the decision to ignore it very easy for me.

on Sep 15, 2006
My wife hit on a thought last night that bears on this. She was thinking, since only 1 person ends up the survivor, it's could very well show that it doesn't matter the race if you're trying to survive. Or something like that. It actually made sense when she said it ...

I can see this as an attempt to show that race doesn't matter to when, but I can also see (foretell?) that it could very well get very ugly, very quickly. Especially after the reactions of the different teams (especially the losers) after last night's immunity challenge.
on Sep 15, 2006
I can see this as an attempt to show that race doesn't matter to when, but I can also see (foretell?) that it could very well get very ugly, very quickly. Especially after the reactions of the different teams (especially the losers) after last night's immunity challenge.


Oh yes! It can get ugly!


My wife hit on a thought last night that bears on this. She was thinking, since only 1 person ends up the survivor, it's could very well show that it doesn't matter the race if you're trying to survive. Or something like that. It actually made sense when she said it ...


It does sound good when you read this, for a moment, made sense for a moment. But that's the thing though, what does it matter about race when only one person will win? Now there's a thought!


on Sep 15, 2006

Actually Survivor has always been diverse in it's population of contenders. 

It probably helps that i"ve followed the show since the first season,  and am such a dyed in the wool fan of it!

The show is for sure losing ratings,  and it's my humble opinion that if they had a bunch of middle-aged people in the majority, instead of the minority,  they might get more of an audience. 

Almost always the majority of the contenders are young and they usually manage to vote off the older ones first! 

There was one exception and the older guy won! 

Social experiment?  could be dangerous to the ratings.....I think it'll still come down to the women vs the men...that season went over pretty good!

Gosh I ramble on.....  

just my 2 cents worth!

on Sep 15, 2006
Gosh I ramble on..... just my 2 cents worth!


Not at all Trudy. Your response was good! They have had a smattering of two or three ethnic diversity in the people who played, that's true. Somehow the disconnect is there though and it's felt by quite a few people.