Life as I Know It; Family; Lifestyle; and Healthy Living!
Should we or shouldn’t we be?
Published on November 15, 2006 By foreverserenity In Parenting
I remember the days of my youth when I could go off either on my own or with my siblings and roam free without my parents worrying about us. We could go from one neighborhood to the next, and back in the day as a very young child I didn’t live in a Subdivision (in those days it would be what’s that?) however, we lived in close proximity to have a neighborhood of kids that could play and hang out together. Everyone knew everyone’s business and you couldn’t do anything bad because we had “a village” raising us.

Yep, back in the day I could run about the road, stay out late until my curfew and not worry about being kidnapped, a pedophile or any such scary things.

These days every parent (including me) keeps a keen watch on their child (ren) to make sure that nothing evil befalls them.

I read an article written by Kristopher Kaiyala on men.msn.com, he thinks we are spiraling out of control and it’s becoming a worrisome trend. Back in his day as a child he too was able to roam free while still keeping in touch with his parents, being home on time and all that.

He says however, that we are not allowing our children to explore and be a kid and thus not encouraging their healthy development and we need to stop smoothing the way for them. In his article he mentioned another writer, Hara Estrof Marano who did an article for Psychology Today entitled “A Nation of Wimps”, who also said that too many parents are quick to have their children “labeled diseased” just because it might help them in school. I’m sorry to say that I actually know someone who thinks this way!

Marano thinks that parents are not allowing their children to find their own identities because they are always quick to do the problem solving. We have a right to be anxious, and there is nothing wrong with that, but we should not be ‘guilt-ridden’. He also said something interesting; for those people who like to think that it’s because parents are likely to be working-parents these days, it’s their fault, it is not. Well thank you Mr. Marano for saying that! [I went into a tizzy the other day when this discussion came up – my thoughts later].

Some parents just do not allow their children to learn some things on their own. They are always there to rescue the child or to spoon feed them. Sometimes it is difficult to not rescue your children, but we do them a disservice when we do. I have to remind myself sometimes too and take a step back that hey, he/she has to figure this out on their own. So I’ve been trying to do that with my three kids. I guess it’s because you’re there for them from birth and you take them through every stage of their development and you’re the one responsible for how they turn out. You sometimes forget when to let go. You want it to be easier for them because it might have not been easy for you; and knowing how difficult life is you want them to not have a hard time in doing what they have to do.

As far as being over-protective goes, I don’t think we’re being too anxious about that. I believe as parents you have to be. My mom always said ‘prevention is better than the cure’ which in our local dialect translated to ‘being cautious and not letting something happen is better than when it happens and having to find the solution for it’. In other words, why let something bad happen when you can prevent it from happening in the first place!

It’s a scary world out there Mr. Kaiyala, and while I do understand and agree with you that we are becoming too anxious and set in our ways of not letting our kids roam free, I think because of what is happening in our world today, we have to put a leech on them in order to keep them safe. That’s sad but true.

Link


Comments
on Nov 15, 2006
I'd be interested in seeing some historical numbers on child-related crime. Are kids actually in more danger, or are they safer than they were 20, 30, 40 years ago? Is the danger we fear now real, or is it an issue of suddenly it's just more talked about? The media spreads a lot of fear about a lot of topics now that have always been around, we just didn't necessarily know it.

I have to agree with the idea that parents are becoming over-anxious, to the point where it gets in the way of kids developing. I grew up with kids whose parents managed everything for them, stepped in to take care of every mishap, and in general coddled the kid all the time. There was no opportunity for them to learn proper consequences to actions, no opportunity for them to learn how to learn on their own. Many of them completely flopped when they went to college and for the first time didn't have their parents there to take care of all the details.

A parent may need to be more aware of things now than before, but I dont think the world has deteriorated to the point yet where we have to keep a constant vigil over children. It does them no favors really since it keeps them from learning how to be self-reliant in many cases.

on Nov 15, 2006
Well, I think kids are more in danger if they are living in the UK or South Africa, to name 2. People have the perception that the UK is safe--it is not. We have to remember that the UK
is a cultural mish-mash of legal and illegal immigrants. South Africa is complicated by the great gap between rich and poor--crime levels are high in most cities.

There are highly developed countries like New Zealand where there is very little crime and there are Muslim countries where, believe it or not, crime is also at low levels. As for the USA: I think in this modern World one can never be too cautious. I hate cell phones but there is a lot to be said for equipping all youngsters with a phone from age 7 up. It provides a simple way of keeping in touch and the extra outlay is worth it. Peace of mind is worth anything.
on Nov 15, 2006
But my point is, is any of it necessary?  Are we suddenly in vastly greater danger now than we were just a generation ago?  Is the threat real or percieved? 

How did kids and parents survive the world before cell phones?
on Nov 15, 2006
I'd be interested in seeing some historical numbers on child-related crime. Are kids actually in more danger, or are they safer than they were 20, 30, 40 years ago? Is the danger we fear now real, or is it an issue of suddenly it's just more talked about? The media spreads a lot of fear about a lot of topics now that have always been around, we just didn't necessarily know it.


This is an interesting point Zoomba. It would be interesting to see the numbers. I also agree that the media does seem to help to spread the fear. But then again, another way to look at it is, without the media, would I know all that I do know now?


have to agree with the idea that parents are becoming over-anxious, to the point where it gets in the way of kids developing. I grew up with kids whose parents managed everything for them, stepped in to take care of every mishap, and in general coddled the kid all the time. There was no opportunity for them to learn proper consequences to actions, no opportunity for them to learn how to learn on their own. Many of them completely flopped when they went to college and for the first time didn't have their parents there to take care of all the details.


Yes, I have to agree with you here too. Being in the environment I'm in currently, I see it happen quite often. Young people who cannot make a decision for themselves or in doing so make the wrong ones. There's also the case of as you say, those that have never done anything for themselves so they don't know how to.


A parent may need to be more aware of things now than before, but I dont think the world has deteriorated to the point yet where we have to keep a constant vigil over children. It does them no favors really since it keeps them from learning how to be self-reliant in many cases.


I agree.


Well, I think kids are more in danger if they are living in the UK or South Africa, to name 2. People have the perception that the UK is safe--it is not. We have to remember that the UK


I have friends and relatives who are raising teenagers in the UK and from what they tell me I have to agree with you. I didn't realise how much more access and freedom young people in the UK have than they do here in the US. WhenI say freedom I mean they do things that wouldn't be frowned upon there as it would be here.





I hate cell phones but there is a lot to be said for equipping all youngsters with a phone from age 7 up. It provides a simple way of keeping in touch and the extra outlay is worth it. Peace of mind is worth anything.


Admittedly I got my son a cell phone recently, when he turned 12 because I wanted to be able to keep in touch with him and him me. He goes off with his friends, and I allow him to have play time and he would be gone for at least 3 hours sometimes. While I know where he is, once he needed to get in touch wtih me and he couldn't, the family didn't have a phone and so eventually he got home, it was hair raising. But in a case like that, and to keep tabs on him to remind him it's time to get home, I feel perfectly ok in letting him have it. And as you say Adnauseum, it's peace of mind!


But my point is, is any of it necessary? Are we suddenly in vastly greater danger now than we were just a generation ago? Is the threat real or percieved?


Well Mike I would say that yes, it is necessary. Because of the type of people we are in danger from out there now. There are more of them than was known before. They might have been there before, but we didn't know. Now we know, that makes a whole world of difference.

How did kids and parents survive the world before cell phones?



By still keeping close tabs on them! My oldest survived her younger years without either of us having it. Myself as a child with my siblings survived but those were different times, when such threats were not perceived. Like I said, it's not that they weren't there, they just were not obvious.
on Nov 15, 2006
My father recently told me about the critical reactions he received when he and I were frolicking in the ocean when I was about 2 or 3. At the time, I was already enrolled in swimming lessons because our frequent trips to the beach and neighbor's pools made my safety a huge issue, for neither of my parents can swim to save their lives (literally). At this particular beach, Dad was having a great time dropping me into the water, and I was having fun making my way back up to the surface as I had learned, much to the dismay of onlookers. Now I understand that mixing children with water has always been a reason for concern, but I also agree that we don't give children enough credit for being able to solve their own problems. Can you believe that some doctors think that children can't even skip until a certain age? I've disproven that one, too. My father was certainly cautious, but he didn't feel the need to call the lifeguard everytime he thought I was having problems in the water. Thanks to him, I can swim like a fish in any situation. Thanks to his encouragement of my love for martial arts, I believe I possess a healthy combination of caution and confidence.

Now if he would just stop hacking into my boyfriends' credit reports..........

on Nov 15, 2006
but I also agree that we don't give children enough credit for being able to solve their own problems


I agree with this wholeheartedly too. Sometimes as parents and as adults, we forget and we also get too overprotective!

Thanks to him, I can swim like a fish in any situation. Thanks to his encouragement of my love for martial arts, I believe I possess a healthy combination of caution and confidence.


This is great! I believe in allowing a child to experience some things as well and learning to swim early is one! My 5 year old didn't get formally trained but she's been in the water from an early age too.

Now if he would just stop hacking into my boyfriends' credit reports..........


Hahaha. still being protective!
on Nov 15, 2006
I think the information age has had alot to do with the current paranoia. Our boundries were, home by the time the street lights turned on (not a second later), and we stayed where we could hear her yell for us which was about a block. This ment we couldn't go into other peoples houses also.

When we got older and wanted to go farther, the street light rule was iron clad till I was 15, my parents knew where we were because we had to actually go home, tell them face to face, then we could go. They had to have phone numbers for everyone person's house I went to. I don't think that's exsessive. I think not having a cell phone allowed me more freedom to make my mistakes, get grounded, and learn about honesty.

I don't think my kids will ever have a cell phone till they have their own jobs to pay for them. I think we are overly paranoid because there is just to much information.... "I saw somewhere that someone did something". Things happened to my generation, car wrecks (I still have my crazy 70's "carseat"), kidnappings, same threats now as then, even drugs. It's just now we know to much and fear small town america will turn into downtown NY.
on Nov 16, 2006
I am VERY overprotective.

I live on an Army base, which is much like a small town, and it's fairly well protected. Violent crime occurs rarely, and then usually in the barracks, not in the family housing areas (unless it's domestic violence/child abuse).

I don't trust others to look out for my children, and I don't feel confident that my children will be safe wandering around on their own.

We went camping last month, and it was the first time I've ever let my children just roam around out of my sight. I gave them both a walkie-talkie and they stayed with friends.

I was a nervous wreck the whole time.

I don't want to hinder my children's development, but I can't justify taking any risks with their safety. Of course, on post children under 10 are not allowed to be outside w/o an adult anyway.

I'd rather have a child who is alive and weenie than a dead child who had all the confidence in the world.



on Nov 16, 2006
I don't trust others to look out for my children, and I don't feel confident that my children will be safe wandering around on their own.


Excellent pont here TW.

When I was a kid, all the parents in my neighborhood watched all of us kids as if we were their own. Whether it came down to playing in each others yards and feeding us, or whatever; our friends parents were our parents when we were in their sight, and we were their kids.

What made this possible is all the parents trusted each other, and deserved to be. Today, many parents are worst than their kids, and then those bad habits are passed down to the kids. This destroys the security both parents and children had in the above mentioned.

This country is falling apart at the seams, and what I have said here is at the root of it to a fair extent; IMHO.
on Nov 16, 2006
When we got older and wanted to go farther, the street light rule was iron clad till I was 15, my parents knew where we were because we had to actually go home, tell them face to face, then we could go. They had to have phone numbers for everyone person's house I went to. I don't think that's exsessive. I think not having a cell phone allowed me more freedom to make my mistakes, get grounded, and learn about honesty. I don't think my kids will ever have a cell phone till they have their own jobs to pay for them. I think we are overly paranoid because there is just to much information.... "I saw somewhere that someone did something". Things happened to my generation, car wrecks (I still have my crazy 70's "carseat"), kidnappings, same threats now as then, even drugs. It's just now we know to much and fear small town america will turn into downtown NY.


Good points mslady!


We went camping last month, and it was the first time I've ever let my children just roam around out of my sight. I gave them both a walkie-talkie and they stayed with friends. I was a nervous wreck the whole time.


I can understand!


I don't want to hinder my children's development, but I can't justify taking any risks with their safety. Of course, on post children under 10 are not allowed to be outside w/o an adult anyway.


I understand and I agree about their safety too. I don't allow my daughter outside by herself, she's only 5. She wants to be but no way. The furthest I've allowed her is wthin the same block playing outside with her friends where I can keep an eye on her. But they don't play too often anymore, the kids are gone now or the dad doesn't allow them outside much, I don't know. So that's not a problem anymore.


I'd rather have a child who is alive and weenie than a dead child who had all the confidence in the world.


As a parent I agree!



Today, many parents are worst than their kids, and then those bad habits are passed down to the kids. This destroys the security both parents and children had in the above mentioned.


I agree with this. But I also would like to add that along with this are those parents who just don't care, who just don't want to be friendly and thus stay by themselves and think you're intrusive if you talk to them. A good neighbor doesn't have to be in your face all the time, or you dont' have to have dinner togehter every night, but just being courteous and having some type of good relationship so as to look out for each other, that would be good.