I am no fan of Katie or Dan Rather. But I must lodge a small protest here. Dan's comments, taken in context, were not directed at Katie Couric (although they did disparage her), but at Les Moonvenes. He was accusing Les of "tarting up" and "dumbing down" the news cast. Of course to make the point, he had to basically insinuate (but not state) that katie Couric was nothing more than a pretty face with the IQ of mush.
And for all that, I just chuckle. I find a grain of truth to what he says (and coming from a more reputable person with no perceived bias, may even have legitimacy), but find that the "messenger" in this case is the source of the problem. For not only does he try to trash Moonvenes, and in so doing, Couric, he states Moonvenes: "Does not know about News".
That statement may also be true, but that would be like a forger lecturing us on Ethics. For we now know, with no doubt as it is documented, that Dan Rather knows a lot about Editorials, falsifying data, and obscuring facts to bend the reported news to a pre-arrived at conclusion. But he apparently knows nothing about the NEWS business. News is not editorials. Or lies, or Fraud, or Forgery.
But then I would not expect Dan Rather to know that.
We are talking Dan Blather - who has the IQ of mush after all.