Life as I Know It; Family; Lifestyle; and Healthy Living!
...who are childless?
Published on November 29, 2005 By foreverserenity In Parenting

At some places of work people with children can take time off, they have flex time, leave early, and come in late, use sick time freely, perhaps better benefits and/or other perks?

Uncle Sam gives each parent a Tax Credit for each child. Should someone who is childless feel left out or jealous?

I’ve heard a grumble or two sometime ago from those who are childless that they put in more time than those with kids. Is that really being fair to someone who is a parent though? Of course I’m going to be bias and defend those with kids.

Most times, the parent who works gets there a lot earlier so they can take advantage of leaving early, if they’re allowed to do so. They work just as hard because them having a job is very important to take care of the children.

The workers who don’t have kids: Most times, they get promoted more, they can work more hours and thus impress the boss, get the cushy assignments. They will travel more too.

But isn’t it being counter productive for those who are childless to feel threatened or jealous of the worker who has kids. For one thing, no longer are employers giving out cushy vacation packages, or benefits packages, (although some lucky ones do!); but most don’t even give end of the year bonuses anymore. The benefits for family are a lot more expensive than those for a single person or only two people. Having children to support is so much more expensive than being single.

And of course there are not only the work place dilemmas or working parent dilemmas. For those parents who don’t work in an office environment or who are stay at home moms (or dads), being out and about with their children can be nice at times or can get a bit testy.

If your child acts up in public, people look at you as if you’re weird or you don’t know how to control your kids. You get the go ahead to be the first to board the airplane and you get daggers thrown at you..(if looks could kill!) You give your kids freedom to play or keep themselves occupied while you try to get something done and it’s like you’re considered a bad parent!

In your grocery cart are cereals, cookies, bread, gooey stuff and basics for families with children, while the couple next to you has bottles of wine, French bread, olives and shrimp and other childless couple food in theirs. They look at you, look at your kids having a disagreement in the corner and give that snide smile and you bump into them by accident….yeah, that’s it, by accident on the way out while doting on your kids! Has that ever happened to you? It did to me once…yeah, by accident! (I didn't really bump into them..that's my story and I'm sticking to it!)

But seriously, let me get back to my point, some couples do feel threatened by couples with children. I think they need to get over it though. To each is own. If you don’t want to have them, that’s your business and if I want to have them, that’s mine…isn’t it? To each his own. The thing is, there really is no need to be jealous and the way life is these days if I’m going to get a bump or a favor done because I have my little adorable one with me…such is life! I grab it by the horns!


Comments
on Nov 29, 2005
I'm childless...and I hope that I won't be forever.

But I work in a place where lots of my coworkers have young families. I know I can put in more "free" time than they can, so I do. I volunteer to work with the PTA. I take extra shifts of duty and I really try to just give them a break if they need it, becuase *I* believe that family is important, and most of the other people who work here do, too. I know there will come a time where I'll need someone to cover for me, or whatever when I have kids...so I'm putting in the time now...
on Nov 29, 2005
I'm childless...and I hope that I won't be forever.


Good luck when it's time for you to have yours Marcie!


But I work in a place where lots of my coworkers have young families. I know I can put in more "free" time than they can, so I do. I volunteer to work with the PTA. I take extra shifts of duty and I really try to just give them a break if they need it, becuase *I* believe that family is important, and most of the other people who work here do, too. I know there will come a time where I'll need someone to cover for me, or whatever when I have kids...so I'm putting in the time now...


That's really good and smart of you too! It's a nice thing to do though and I'm sure your colleagues appreciate you more for it.
on Nov 29, 2005
Can I pick on one point?  The Child Tax Credit (A new thing).  When income tax was originally started, it was to only tax the rich on the income they did not need to live on.  Over time, and politicians, it came to tax everyone.  That paltry credit ($1000) does not pay for the raising and support of a child during a year!  Not even close.  A childless couple is still much better off.  If you have having children for the tax break, you are a very poor person math wise!
on Nov 30, 2005
Can I pick on one point? The Child Tax Credit (A new thing). When income tax was originally started, it was to only tax the rich on the income they did not need to live on. Over time, and politicians, it came to tax everyone. That paltry credit ($1000) does not pay for the raising and support of a child during a year! Not even close. A childless couple is still much better off. If you have having children for the tax break, you are a very poor person math wise!


Yep! And good point!
on Dec 05, 2005
Uncle Sam gives each parent a Tax Credit for each child. Should someone who is childless feel left out or jealous?

No. Childless individuals are often dependent on social security to be part of their support when they retire. Because of the foolish structure of our SS system, the wage earners pay the benefits of the previous generation. So when a childless individual retires, they will often do so dependent on the children produced by the families who were NOT childless. The concept behind paying tax credits for these children is that families will be encouraged to have children who will contribute to the labor force and to the retirement of the generation before.

As for the benefits the employer gives, that's up to the individual employer. Most offer benefits for people with families because of the belief that workers with families will be more stablke, consistent workers. Whether that's true or not I don't know, but it is part of the consideration of an employer in giving benefits.
on Dec 05, 2005
A childless couple is still much better off. If you have having children for the tax break, you are a very poor person math wise!


Bingo!
on Dec 05, 2005
but I have known MANY that use their children as exuses to miss work far more often than any childless person would be able to get away with, and I've known many who then dumped their kids off at daycare just they would any other working day so they lay around and party.Often these women are getting taxpayer subsidized daycare, too, so they've got it made no matter how you look at it. Theyve got a built in excuse to miss work, and taxpayer funded daycare, which they abuse even when they've stayed home for the day, and yeah, I resented that. A lot.


This is true and awful for any who does that. No true parent would though, I mean honest ones. But yea, I know they're out there.



No. Childless individuals are often dependent on social security to be part of their support when they retire. Because of the foolish structure of our SS system, the wage earners pay the benefits of the previous generation. So when a childless individual retires, they will often do so dependent on the children produced by the families who were NOT childless. The concept behind paying tax credits for these children is that families will be encouraged to have children who will contribute to the labor force and to the retirement of the generation before.


I agree our SS system is foolishly structured. Since it was done so many years ago when everything was different then, you would think they politicians would change it, make it a better fit for today!


Whether that's true or not I don't know, but it is part of the consideration of an employer in giving benefits.


True, but you also have the other side of the coin. Those who feel that employees with kids mean less work time. I guess it's a catch 22 situation these days. Especially with everyone, almost everyone losing out on the reduction or axing of benefits by some employers.